- Cubase update fee versus logic pro x for mac user manual#
- Cubase update fee versus logic pro x for mac user software#
- Cubase update fee versus logic pro x for mac user Pc#
The issue is that the vertical resolution is somewhat limited and you lose a visual connection with the MIDI note data. If you work in the arrange view and set the track to region based automation then you can access multiple MIDI data lanes at once. Often there’s times where various controller data need to line up or be synchronized in some way, and having only a single lane makes it rather difficult. There’s a single controller lane in the MIDI editor. Piano Roll Editor Single MIDI controller lane A feature is needed to create new a new region when doing certain actions. If you make changes to a file, then all regions referencing that are changed.Ĭertain actions like ‘Remove DC Offset’, ‘Reverse’ and ‘Normalize’ are only available in the file editor, but you may not want to modify all regions referencing that file. There’s some functions that are only possible in the ‘File Editor’. Hopefully this is improved in the future.
Cubase update fee versus logic pro x for mac user manual#
That means that adjusting multitrack recordings to tempo is still the only manual method. Smart Tempo is awesome but currently it can only be applied in the audio editor, and not to multitrack parts. Most plugins are available as Audio Units though, so it’s not a big deal.
There’s a VST to AU adapter and the even better Metaplugin that allow you to run VSTs in Logic, but it’d be nice if this was just integrated. This is a minor nitpick, but Logic only supports AU’s natively. You can’t do anything except target a tiny little GUI widget and browse a menu. You must click that up/down arrow shown next to Chromaverb above then click a menu item labeled ‘No Plug-in’ to remove a plugin. Maybe that’s a bit hyperbolic, but it sure feels like it sometimes. I think that I spend about 20% of my time mixing in Logic fumbling with that stupid little bar. Yes, I’m talking about that space below the FX. In order to add an FX when there’s an FX present you must click that tiny little bar. I’ve included a screenshot above with an arrow showing the tiny area. When adding plugins there’s a very tiny bar for you to select. Regardless of how it’s done, the way Logic does it is probably the worst. Another excellent option is the way that Studio One handles it where there’s an organized browser with screenshots. Even though you can organize plugins pretty nicely, selecting those plugins requires visually parsing and navigating multi-tiered menus.
Cubase update fee versus logic pro x for mac user software#
Just goes to show you, software is just software, bells and whistles will always be added with each upgrade, but it's the person using it that makes the difference.Ībelton is very nice, I like to add some of the effects in live to some of my samples.It’s time for the post that everyone seems to love: when I talk about the stuff I dislike about a DAW.įirst things first: If you see anything that’s wrong or know of a great work around then please leave a comment. I know many people who use it as their main sequencer nowadays, as it's so brilliant.
Cubase update fee versus logic pro x for mac user Pc#
Most home musos and pros alike are making killer material with a pc and Cubase, even Atari is still being used by some (tight sequencing).įurthermore, don't discount Ableton Live as one of the main apps. I base this on all the artist and engineer interviews I read in Sound On Sound and Future Music for the past 4 years. In Europe, specifically the UK, Cubase and Logic are more widespread, with PT LE catching up at a rapid rate. In many cases, it's a combination of both PT and something else. For the more midi-based musician and film composers, Logic and DP seem to be the ones. Sound for film, post-production and major studio multitracking, it's PT hands-down. This also depends on what area of audio we're talking about. I would say in the US, it's mostly PT or Logic.
0 kommentar(er)
